You might call it coincidence

…but I’m not so sure.

I’ve come across some posts from Hemet that go along way in addressing some of the spiritual malaise I’ve been feeling.

The first place I found it was from the Netjer & Ma’at and Ma’at & Personal Responsibility letters that I had the good fortune of re-discovering through someone else’s blog.

A couple of notes of interest (emphasis mine):

We do not have the luxury of omnipotent deities that are either pulling all the foreordained strings anyway, or will “fix it” for us. The gods and goddesses expect us to be responsible children and do what is right, so that the right will return to us and multiply and benefit everyone. Netjer does not intervene in the troubles of mankind not because It doesn’t care, but because It has, in Its wisdom, already provided a mechanism by which Its creation can ultimately check itself: the process of Ma’at.

Wehem: Netjer & Ma’at Shomu III, Week 2, Year 6

And yet:

…this also doesn’t mean Kemetic Orthodoxy has a naive worldview in which as long as we are faithful and “good” nothing bad will ever happen to us. Being children of Netjer, while the best gift we could ever expect to be given, doesn’t grant immunity from bad times; according to our mythology, even the Names of Netjer Themselves occasionally are affected by the unexpected or the sinister, in the form of the Nameless One, the Uncreated, which is outside the universe and therefore cannot be controlled by Ma’at. Occasionally, it may get in and disrupt, manifesting in “evil” in our lives and our societies.

Wehem: Ma’at & Personal Responsibility Shomu III, Week 3,  Year 6

I still have questions, but I’m a lot closer to the answer now that I’ve remembered to look for the answers.

The other issue that has been bothering me is why I feel such a disconnect from Netjer. Usually when it happens I end up realizing that I’m depressed. But I’m not. So why?

An answer came in a post from Hemet in response to some questions from another member of the temple. I can’t quote directly from that area, but to paraphrase, the relationships with the gods grow, change, get comfortable, or distant. The gods aren’t omnipotent, though they seem to be because they are so much more powerful and bigger than us. And silence from the gods isn’t a sign of being forgotten by them, they’re there even if I don’t notice.

I noticed a my posts went “A year without seut” to “The slide into agnosticsm” and I can tell you that is almost definately not a coincidence.


3 thoughts on “You might call it coincidence

  1. “A year without seut” to “The slide into agnosticsm” and I can tell you that is almost definately not a coincidence.

    Just a thought; Part of the Senut is about opening the way. If you basically, close (or just quit opening) the door for anyone for a year, it could become difficult to experience them as very close or influential.

  2. I agree: part of making this work is doing Senut. It becomes a cycle that basically spirals into what’s the point until either you give up entirely, or something comes along and makes you see the point.

    Luckily, I see the point again 🙂

  3. Luellon says:

    em hotep,

    Hi, Wedjbai!

    This is Luellon from Livejournal.

    I’m starting to see the point of connecting to the deities again, but I light candles to them and pray.

    I haven’t done ritual in awhile. I used to try to do it everyday a few years back and it was draining me.

    I try now to just do ritual for Aset on Her feastdays. I’ll give offerings to the deities on other days, but not do ritual.

    Maybe I’m missing the point.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s